Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at DXC Technology, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process started with technical deep-dives but still kept a clear HR thread around the edges. First, I had a talk with HR focused on my background, my skills, and what motivated me to consider a change. It helped frame the rest of the process.
My interview began with an intro and a conversation about my previous projects and overall work experience. From there, the technical portion went deep into the Microsoft stack. I talked through my experience with .NET, C#, ASP.NET Core, and SQL, and we covered REST APIs and front-end work too, including JavaScript and Angular.
The interview process typically consists of multiple rounds, often starting with an HR conversation followed by technical discussions, which may include coding assessments and project reviews. Candidates noted that the timeline can stretch due to scheduling and review processes, making the overall experience feel longer than expected.
Candidates experienced a variety of technical assessments, including coding challenges, system design discussions, and foundational engineering questions. The focus often included specific technologies like Java, .NET, and Python, with some interviews emphasizing practical problem-solving over theoretical knowledge.
Some candidates were required to complete take-home assignments that involved coding projects, which were then discussed in follow-up interviews. This part of the process was noted to be time-consuming but provided a platform for deeper technical evaluation and discussion of design choices.
Many candidates reported that HR rounds and some technical interviews included discussions focused on cultural fit and behavioral aspects rather than purely technical skills. This approach aimed to assess how well candidates aligned with the company's values and team dynamics.
The overall atmosphere of the interviews was described as friendly and professional, with many candidates feeling comfortable during discussions. The difficulty level was generally perceived as average or easy, although some reported variations in intensity depending on the interviewer.
Candidates expressed mixed experiences regarding communication throughout the process, with some feeling well-informed and others left in limbo after positive feedback. Clear communication about next steps and timely feedback were highlighted as important for a positive candidate experience.