Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Data Analyst at Criteo, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After a recruiter call, I ended up moving through a pretty structured sequence that felt organized and personal. About a week later I had an HR phone screener with the recruiter, who actually walked me through what to expect and kept things moving. The next step was a longer behavioral conversation with a director of analytics, where the questions stayed grounded in how I’d worked and how I think about impact.
My process started with an HR conversation—first with a talent specialist—to confirm fit. I remember the purpose being less about deep technical skill and more about alignment. After that, I had a manager-level interview where the focus shifted to whether I understood what the role would actually require as a data analyst.
The interview process typically begins with an HR screen followed by a structured sequence of interviews that includes behavioral, technical, and presentation rounds, often with a clear timeline and organized feedback throughout.
Candidates can expect behavioral interviews that focus on alignment with the company's values and understanding the role's requirements, often involving personal experiences related to data analytics.
The technical evaluation usually includes SQL and Python assessments, with a mix of live coding tests and proctored SQL tests that require candidates to demonstrate their skills under pressure.
Candidates are often required to prepare and present a case study based on a dataset, which emphasizes analytical thinking and the ability to communicate findings effectively to stakeholders.
While many candidates appreciated the clarity and organization of the process, some reported issues with communication and follow-up, particularly after the final interviews, which affected their overall impression of the company.
The interview process is generally perceived as challenging, with high expectations for both technical skills and analytical reasoning, which may vary in intensity across different rounds.