Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Clouddevs, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After a recruiter-style reach-out, I ended up with a quick front-and-back technical test. The front portion was building a simple React tic-tac-toe experience, and the back portion focused on making a request to an internal API endpoint that they use. The whole thing felt straightforward but very hands-on, and I ultimately didn’t get an offer. My overall impression was that it was an efficiency-first screen: if you could implement, you moved on, and if not, you disappeared.
I started with a very compressed Zoom-style screening where the interviewer wanted my camera on, but didn’t turn theirs on. The conversation barely felt like an intro to the company—it mostly circled around basic experience details like how many years I had with certain technologies, along with questions that could’ve been answered from my resume. Shortly after, I received a link to a coding assessment (using Coderbyte in my case), and I completed it successfully. Then the communication went quiet, and I either never received feedback or it stalled after that stage.
The initial screening often involves a brief conversation focused on basic qualifications and communication skills, with little context about the company or role. Candidates reported feeling that this stage was impersonal and overly procedural, lacking warmth and engagement.
Candidates typically face a series of technical assessments, including coding tasks that range from simple implementations to more complex algorithm challenges. The assessments are often conducted through automated platforms or live coding sessions, emphasizing problem-solving skills under observation.
Some candidates experience a project interview where they must build a full-stack project and discuss their implementation. This stage is seen as demanding and is designed to evaluate both technical skills and the candidate's thought process.
Many candidates express frustration over the lack of feedback and follow-up after assessments, often feeling left in the dark about their progress. Reports indicate a common theme of silence post-interview, leading to a sense of wasted time and effort.
The overall tone of the interview process is described as serious and efficiency-focused, with candidates feeling tested rigorously. While some appreciated the structured approach, others felt it lacked the human touch and respect for their time and questions.
Interactions with recruiters are often perceived as lacking professionalism, with instances of missed meetings and unclear communication. Candidates noted that the recruiter’s engagement level set a tone for the overall experience, which often felt disjointed.
