My experience started with an interview that felt more architect-oriented than I expected for a software engineering role. The conversation centered on system design and how I would build an application like the one they had in mind, and it was definitely framed at a higher level than just “what frameworks do you know.”
After the meetings, what followed was the part that stuck with me: I ended up completely ghosted. I tried reaching out multiple times to get any response, but I either got ignored or only received vague updates like things being on hold. It wasn’t even that I was expecting detailed feedback, but some kind of closure—positive or negative—would’ve been fair.
5 months ago
Average Positive Bucharest, Bucuresti
I went through a pretty standard, structured pipeline. It started with an HR discussion, then I had a technical interview focused on the frameworks I’d worked with and how I’d design something similar. After that, there was an end-client technical conversation that mixed discussion of my background with a more practical focus on fit and how I’d work with the team, and then I wrapped up with a final conversation tied to the offer.
What stood out to me was how the technical portion felt less about random trivia and more about walking through design choices—how to think about building an application like the one they were describing, including the overall system angle. The process felt orderly and clear in steps, and I remember how the communication around the contract proposal and details came through as part of the flow.
10 months ago
Average Negative Athens, Athens, Attica
From the beginning, my interviews were colored by attitude more than by the technical questions. One discussion felt like it was meant to be a theory …
> 1 year
Average Positive Romania
My process started online with a personality assessment, and that early step was followed fairly quickly by an HR conversation. After that I spoke wit…
> 1 year
Positive Bucharest, Bucuresti
After a recruiter call, I went through a phone-based pre-screen that focused on motivation and whether I’d be a good fit with the team. It felt more l…
Unlock every Software Engineer interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Phases
The interview process is organized into clear phases, typically starting with an HR conversation, followed by technical interviews that assess both system design and coding skills. Candidates can expect a structured flow that progresses from general fit to specific technical evaluations.
HR interviewTechnical interviewStructured process
Technical Focus & Assessment
Technical interviews emphasize practical problem-solving and system design rather than just theoretical knowledge or syntax. Candidates should be prepared to discuss their previous experiences and how they would approach building applications.
System designPractical problem-solvingTechnical assessment
Behavioral & Cultural Fit
Interviews often include discussions around motivation, team fit, and personal ambitions, aiming to gauge how candidates align with the company's culture. Candidates should be ready to articulate their experiences and values in relation to the role.
Cultural fitMotivationBehavioral questions
Communication & Feedback
Candidates have reported varied experiences regarding communication, with some experiencing a lack of follow-up after interviews, while others appreciated timely feedback throughout the process. It's advisable to seek clarity on next steps and feedback after each round.
CommunicationFeedbackFollow-up
Interview Tone & Professionalism
The tone of interviews can vary significantly; while some candidates report respectful and constructive interactions, others have experienced unprofessional behavior. Candidates should be prepared for a range of interpersonal dynamics during their interviews.
The overall difficulty of the interview process is generally described as average, with a mix of challenging yet rewarding questions. Candidates should be prepared for a serious evaluation that balances technical depth with a supportive atmosphere.