Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at CDK Global, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
The process started with in-person interviews that escalated quickly, then it turned into virtual follow-ups after a short gap. I ended up going through several rounds face to face, and the later steps were scheduled within about a week of the earlier ones. Even when I felt the conversations went reasonably well, the overall experience became frustrating because the effort-to-feedback ratio didn’t match the time they asked me to invest.
I started with an HR call that was mainly about fit and how I’d work with others. A short time after that, I moved into technical interviews that leaned heavily on my resume and my day-to-day experience. In the coding portion, the questions weren’t presented like a brutal algorithm gauntlet—more like practical problem-solving, including easy-to-medium LeetCode-style work that I could reason through.
The interview process typically begins with an HR call followed by multiple technical rounds, often transitioning from coding to behavioral assessments. Candidates noted varying timelines, with some experiencing long gaps between rounds, which could lead to frustration.
Candidates faced a range of technical questions, including coding challenges that varied in difficulty from practical problem-solving to more complex system design and algorithm questions. Some reported a focus on core engineering fundamentals and real-world applications.
Behavioral interviews were common, emphasizing communication skills, teamwork, and cultural fit rather than solely technical prowess. Many candidates felt that the process aimed to understand their personal journey and collaboration style.
Candidates expressed concerns about the lack of feedback and transparency throughout the process, with some reporting minimal follow-up after interviews, which contributed to a frustrating experience. Clear communication about expectations and outcomes was noted as a positive aspect when present.
The overall difficulty of interviews was perceived as high, with some candidates feeling the pressure of a competitive environment akin to FAANG interviews. Others described a more supportive atmosphere that allowed for manageable discussions.
While many candidates appreciated a structured and organized process, others reported disorganization and unprofessional interactions during interviews, which negatively impacted their experience. Consistency in scheduling and interviewer professionalism was highlighted as crucial.