Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at BD, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My experience started with good intentions but collapsed into a frustrating lack of coordination. I arrived early and waited, then sat at the security area while the interview didn’t happen as scheduled. Eventually a text came through explaining the hiring manager was on medical leave, and rather than getting a clean reschedule, another manager ended up conducting the interview after a long total wait. I remember following up afterward expecting at least basic acknowledgment, but I didn’t receive an apology and the recruiter didn’t respond.
I had a simpler process that still felt a little inefficient in how it was run. I began with an online assessment that was fairly easy, with questions that were mostly research-and-knowledge based. After that, the process moved to an in-person interview. The whole flow felt like it had clear stages, and I didn’t sense a heavy technical gauntlet.
The interview process typically includes a phone screen followed by multiple rounds, often involving both technical and behavioral assessments, with some candidates experiencing panel-style interviews. The structure is generally clear, but some candidates noted inefficiencies and a lack of coordination between rounds.
Candidates can expect a significant focus on technical skills, including coding challenges and discussions about past projects, often requiring them to explain their thought processes during problem-solving. The technical rounds may vary in intensity, with some candidates finding them manageable while others felt the expectations were misaligned with their experience level.
Many candidates reported issues with communication post-interview, including delays in feedback and a lack of closure, leading to feelings of being ghosted. While some experienced timely updates, the inconsistency in follow-up left a negative impression on several candidates.
The overall atmosphere during interviews is often described as friendly and professional, with interviewers engaging in meaningful conversations. However, some candidates noted that the experience could vary significantly based on the interviewers' engagement levels and preparedness.
Candidates experienced logistical challenges, such as last-minute scheduling changes and inefficient use of time, which could detract from the overall interview experience. Some felt that certain discussions could have been handled virtually rather than requiring in-person attendance.
The timeline for the interview process can vary widely, with some candidates experiencing lengthy delays between rounds and final decisions, which can impact their momentum and overall impression of the company. Even when the process is quick, the lack of timely closure can leave candidates feeling frustrated.