My journey kicked off with a recruiter chat where it was mostly logistics and normal background questions. That was followed by a conversation with the hiring manager that focused heavily on my previous working experience, and that part went really well.
After that, I completed a take-home system design deliverable: I turned in a written document, then presented the design to two team members. They asked follow-ups and pressed into deeper details during the Q&A, so it wasn’t just a walkthrough—I had to defend choices and answer their questions live.
3 months ago
Difficult Positive Seattle, WA
After I applied, my process started with an automated AI behavioral screening bot. It asked questions about my background and experience and, even though there wasn’t any coding, it still felt like a real gate because the bot was acting as the filter before anything technical.
A few days later I moved into a LeetCode-style coding round focused on algorithms and data structures. After that I had a timed online coding assessment delivered through a proctored platform, which felt like the same skill area but heavier on pressure and structure. Once those were done, I got pulled into Axon’s ACE behavioral-style round with an engineering director. That one was much more intense than a typical behavioral conversation—lots of deep STAR-style probing tied to ownership, cross-team collaboration, technical decision-making, and initiative, and they dug multiple layers into projects on my resume.
4 months ago
Easy Negative Seattle, WA
My experience got derailed by communication that felt completely unreliable from early on. I was contacted by a recruiter who marked a phone call as t…
4 months ago
Average Positive Atlanta, GA
My process started with a hiring-manager-style screen that lasted about an hour and focused on C# .NET. After that, I did four more technical intervie…
5 months ago
Easy Negative United States
I went into this thinking it would be a straightforward, shorter process, but it became one of the worst experiences I’d ever had. The whole thing was…
Unlock every Software Engineer interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Recruiter & Initial Screening
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter call that covers logistics and background questions, followed by a technical screening that may include behavioral elements. Candidates should be prepared for varied experiences, as some reported efficient communication while others faced significant delays or ghosting.
Recruiter callLogisticsBehavioral screening
Technical Coding Rounds
Candidates can expect multiple coding interviews that often follow a LeetCode-style format, focusing on algorithms and data structures. The difficulty level is generally medium to high, and interviewers emphasize the approach and problem-solving process rather than just the final answer.
LeetCodeAlgorithmsProblem-solving
System Design Interviews
System design is a significant component of the interview process, with multiple rounds dedicated to evaluating candidates' design skills and decision-making. Candidates should be ready to present their designs and defend their choices during these discussions.
System designDesign choicesDecision-making
Behavioral & Values Alignment
Behavioral interviews are integrated throughout the process, often using the STAR method to probe into candidates' past experiences and alignment with company values. Expect in-depth questioning that explores ownership, collaboration, and initiative.
BehavioralSTARValues alignment
Interview Structure & Communication
The overall structure of the interview process can vary widely, with some candidates experiencing well-organized and timely scheduling, while others faced disorganization and poor communication. It's important to be prepared for potential delays and a lack of feedback after interviews.
Interview structureCommunicationFeedback
Overall Experience & Outcome
Candidates reported a mix of experiences, from rigorous and professional processes to chaotic and frustrating ones. While some felt the interviews were fair and reflective of their skills, others left feeling confused about the criteria for success and disappointed by the lack of follow-up.