Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Aveva, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After the recruiter call, about a week later I went into two back-to-back technical rounds, followed by an HR round. The first technical round was a resume-and-project discussion where they focused on the purpose behind what I built and how I approached the problem—why I made specific implementation choices and what I was trying to achieve overall. I felt like they were checking whether I understood my own work end to end, not just whether I could list technologies.
I started with an online assessment covering logic and behavior, and after that I had an HR conversation about my experience and what I knew about the company. The process sounded simple, but the timeline dragged. It took them about three to four weeks to get back after the assessment day, and when they did, it was only to say they were focusing on returning interns.
The interview process typically begins with an HR call followed by multiple technical rounds, often including a mix of behavioral and system design interviews. Candidates noted that timelines can vary significantly, with some experiencing quick feedback while others faced delays and lack of communication.
Technical interviews often emphasize understanding of fundamental concepts, such as OOP, DBMS, and basic coding tasks, rather than advanced algorithmic challenges. Candidates are frequently asked to explain their thought processes and decisions related to their projects.
Behavioral interviews are a significant part of the process, focusing on past experiences and how candidates handle various situations. Many candidates reported that the interviewers aimed to assess cultural fit and communication skills, creating a relaxed atmosphere.
Overall, candidates described the difficulty of the interviews as average to easy, with expectations clearly communicated throughout the process. Some candidates felt that the focus on fundamentals allowed for a more manageable experience.
Candidates noted that interviews often involved multiple interviewers, creating a panel format that allowed for diverse questioning. Many reported positive interactions with interviewers, who were described as polite and engaged, contributing to a comfortable interview environment.
Several candidates experienced issues with follow-up communication, particularly after interviews, leading to confusion or frustration regarding their application status. Clear communication was highlighted as a key area for improvement in the hiring process.