After I applied, a recruiter reached out a few days later and the process moved into a sequence of technical conversations. I did two rounds by phone with two different engineers, and each call felt like a serious deep dive rather than a quick screen.
What really stood out was the workload that followed: I was given a take-home design challenge that I completed over about a week, and then I had to submit my materials—slides and CAD files. After that, the schedule ramped up into a full day of back-to-back interviews with the team, plus time to review the design challenge. End to end, it took at least a month, and the pacing meant a lot of waiting between stages.
3 months ago
Difficult Positive Cupertino, CA
My process began with an interview with the hiring manager, and then I moved into a virtual onsite format. The onsite wasn’t framed as purely behavioral—it blended in mechanical engineering questions alongside questions tailored to the specific team and the skills they were prioritizing.
I ended up covering fundamentals like beam deflection and GD&T, plus broader design analysis topics. The style of questioning pushed into how I approached the problems, and it felt like they wanted depth rather than surface-level answers. Some of the conversations also leaned heavily into a deep dive of my experiences, with fewer classic “tell me about yourself” moments.
3 months ago
Easy Neutral San Jose, CA
The early part of my process was very light. I had a quick conversation about my current experience and then explained background details around how t…
3 months ago
Difficult Positive United States
My interview started with a conversation about a project I was genuinely proud of. That opened the door for the interviewer to dig into how I thought …
4 months ago
Average Neutral Munich, Bavaria
My first step was a 30–45 minute video call. The email I received beforehand suggested a mix of behavioral prompts like “why Apple?” along with techni…
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Timeline
The interview process typically spans several weeks, beginning with initial conversations followed by a take-home design challenge and culminating in a full day of back-to-back interviews. Candidates should expect a structured yet demanding timeline with significant waiting periods between stages.
TimelineStructured ProcessTake-home Challenge
Technical Depth & Problem-Solving
Candidates are expected to demonstrate strong technical knowledge and reasoning skills, particularly in areas like materials science, structural analysis, and design fundamentals. Interviews often involve scenario-based questions that require candidates to connect concepts and articulate their thought processes.
Interviews often start with discussions about past projects and personal motivations, allowing candidates to showcase their work and thought processes. However, candidates should be prepared for a mix of behavioral and technical questions, often with less emphasis on traditional warm-up questions.
The interview environment is generally supportive and respectful, with interviewers showing genuine interest in candidates' experiences. This positive tone can help ease the pressure, but candidates should still be prepared for rigorous questioning.
Candidates may experience delays in communication and follow-up after interviews, leading to uncertainty about their status. It's important to remain patient and proactive in seeking updates during this period.
CommunicationFollow-UpUncertainty
Expectations for Presentation
Candidates should focus on presenting their work clearly and concisely, as there is an expectation for a well-packaged presentation of their portfolio. A lack of organization in presenting work may hinder candidates' performance.
Presentation SkillsPortfolio OrganizationClear Communication