The early part of my process was very light. I had a quick conversation about my current experience and then explained background details around how the team worked—designers worked solo on pieces, but there were critiques every sprint with other designers. The tone felt straightforward, and the scope didn’t feel overly complicated.
What ultimately happened surprised me: after that initial interaction, I was ghosted. There wasn’t a clear follow-up or closure after the early stage, so the experience ended without an official decision. It was relatively easy at the start, but the lack of communication made it feel unresolved rather than complete.
5 months ago
Average Neutral Munich, Bavaria
My first step was a 30–45 minute video call. The email I received beforehand suggested a mix of behavioral prompts like “why Apple?” along with technical questions, and I prepared for a split that would include a genuine getting-to-know-you phase.
Instead, the interviewer skipped the warm-up and jumped straight into technical questions. What caught me off guard was that the technical portion felt more “back to basics” than the advanced topics I’d spent time studying. After that, the conversations that followed overall felt thoughtful and engaging—people were clearly passionate, and at least one interviewer made the discussion feel comfortable and conversational.
6 months ago
Average Positive Cupertino, CA
I went through the interview process with two different art directors, and both felt genuinely kind and easy to talk to. I walked them through my proj…
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Timeline
The interview process typically spans several weeks, beginning with initial conversations followed by a take-home design challenge and culminating in a full day of back-to-back interviews. Candidates should expect a structured yet demanding timeline with significant waiting periods between stages.
TimelineStructured ProcessTake-home Challenge
Technical Depth & Problem-Solving
Candidates are expected to demonstrate strong technical knowledge and reasoning skills, particularly in areas like materials science, structural analysis, and design fundamentals. Interviews often involve scenario-based questions that require candidates to connect concepts and articulate their thought processes.
Interviews often start with discussions about past projects and personal motivations, allowing candidates to showcase their work and thought processes. However, candidates should be prepared for a mix of behavioral and technical questions, often with less emphasis on traditional warm-up questions.
The interview environment is generally supportive and respectful, with interviewers showing genuine interest in candidates' experiences. This positive tone can help ease the pressure, but candidates should still be prepared for rigorous questioning.
Candidates may experience delays in communication and follow-up after interviews, leading to uncertainty about their status. It's important to remain patient and proactive in seeking updates during this period.
CommunicationFollow-UpUncertainty
Expectations for Presentation
Candidates should focus on presenting their work clearly and concisely, as there is an expectation for a well-packaged presentation of their portfolio. A lack of organization in presenting work may hinder candidates' performance.
Presentation SkillsPortfolio OrganizationClear Communication