Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Research Scientist at Amgen, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I started with a recruiter call where the questions felt pretty typical for a research role. I talked through why I wanted to join Amgen, where I saw myself in the next few years, what my salary expectations were, and a set of questions tied closely to the techniques listed in the posting. It also included some basic logistics questions like availability.
After applying, I ended up in a recruiter screen and then a longer sequence that really stood out for its structure. A seminar round came next, including Q&A, and it felt like the format was designed to see how I presented and handled follow-up.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter screen followed by a hiring manager interview, focusing on the candidate's background and fit for the role rather than deep technical questions. This stage is generally straightforward and comfortable, allowing candidates to express their motivations and expectations.
A significant part of the interview process involves a presentation of the candidate's prior work, often requiring them to summarize their research clearly and respond to detailed questions. This presentation serves as a critical evaluation point and can be a source of pressure due to the depth of inquiry it invites.
Candidates typically experience a series of one-on-one interviews and panel discussions with team members, where the focus is on understanding how their background aligns with the team's work and culture. These interviews are structured to assess both technical skills and team fit, often without aggressive questioning.
The interview process is described as organized and structured, with a clear sequence of steps that include multiple conversations and a presentation. However, some candidates noted that the experience can be demanding due to the volume of interviews and the time commitment involved.
Candidates reported varying experiences with communication post-interview, with some experiencing delays or a lack of follow-up after the final stages. This inconsistency can lead to frustration and uncertainty regarding their application status.
While many candidates felt the interview process was fair and professional, some expressed disappointment with the final outcomes, particularly when they perceived a lack of transparency in decision-making. The overall experience often left candidates with mixed feelings about their fit and the company's evaluation process.