Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at American Airlines, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I got pulled in for a pretty focused technical conversation after an initial step. The questions centered on the kinds of projects I’d actually worked on, with a lot of “walk me through what you did” style prompts. From there, the interviewer moved into programming questions—one example that stuck with me was building something like a jagged number structure from a list.
My technical interview felt straightforward and calm. I sat down for a LeetCode-style, object-oriented coding round where they basically asked me to solve easy to manageable problems rather than something obscure or overly tricky. The expectation was that I’d complete at least one question in about 30 minutes, and because the problems were genuinely on the easier side, I ended up solving three.
Candidates can expect a mix of coding exercises that focus on fundamental programming concepts, often including object-oriented programming and data structures. The coding problems are generally manageable, with an emphasis on clean coding and clear communication during the problem-solving process.
Interviews often delve into specific technologies such as Azure, PostgreSQL, and various programming languages, with some candidates reporting a strong emphasis on cloud and DevOps topics. Expect questions that assess both breadth and depth of knowledge across multiple technologies.
Behavioral interviews typically include STAR-style questions aimed at understanding candidates' thought processes and teamwork capabilities. The focus is on how candidates approach problems and their past experiences in a team context.
The interview process is generally well-structured, often consisting of multiple rounds that include both technical and behavioral assessments. Candidates appreciate the organized flow, which helps reduce stress and confusion during the evaluation.
While the interviews are often professional, candidates have noted that feedback and communication regarding outcomes can be lacking, sometimes leading to frustration. Clearer timelines and feedback would enhance the overall experience.
Overall, the difficulty of the interviews is described as average, with some candidates finding certain rounds challenging due to the depth of questions. However, many report a positive experience, feeling that the interviews were designed to assess their capabilities rather than to trick them.