Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Airwallex, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I went through a pretty full loop and it ended with a hard stop at the final round. Before the end, I’d done live coding, system design, and behavioral conversations with three different interviewers, and they all gave me a positive feeling. The recruiter and early rounds felt like they were building a picture of my fit.
I started with a short recruiter call where I introduced myself, talked through why I’d applied, and answered questions about how I’d prioritize learning through the opportunity. After that, I had a technical interview that lasted about an hour and included an AI-enabled section at the end. The whole technical block felt structured, like they were trying to see both how I think and how I interact when the prompts get more interactive.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter call, followed by multiple technical rounds including coding, system design, and behavioral interviews, often culminating in a final assessment or bar raiser round. Candidates noted that the timeline was generally efficient, with prompt scheduling and feedback.
Candidates experienced a mix of coding challenges, system design discussions, and algorithm problems, with some rounds focusing on LeetCode-style questions while others required real-world problem-solving related to specific domains like banking. The technical difficulty varied, but many felt the assessments were structured and relevant.
Behavioral interviews were a consistent part of the process, often revisiting themes from earlier rounds, but candidates reported mixed experiences regarding the clarity and relevance of questions asked, particularly in final interviews with higher-level management.
While many candidates appreciated the professionalism and responsiveness of recruiters, there were frequent mentions of a lack of constructive feedback after interviews, leading to uncertainty about performance and decision-making criteria.
Overall, candidates described the interview atmosphere as friendly and respectful, with interviewers often fostering a conversational tone rather than a combative one. However, some reported instances of disorganization or unclear expectations that negatively impacted their experience.
Candidates noted that the final decision often felt disconnected from their performance in earlier rounds, with some expressing frustration over how previous assessments seemed to carry less weight than anticipated, particularly in the final stages.