My process was three rounds and it started strong. I began with a talent screening call, then had a deeper technical discussion with technical hiring managers. That part focused on complex hyperscaler facility design, and I got asked hard questions about running dual-path hydraulic loops, calculating strict thermal margins when switching between air and liquid cooling in mixed-density data halls, and handling rapid economizer/free-cooling switchovers under extreme weather changes. The managers listened closely, and the conversation felt genuinely productive.
The shift came in the final round. I was brought in with a director for more advanced immersion-cooling related questions, including specifics around dielectric fluids and how adiabatic cooling systems work mechanically. I tried to answer in detail, but I also drew a line around proprietary information that was still under patent process. When I refused to disclose that, the tone changed fast—it turned interrogational, condescending, and patronizing, like I was being treated as less capable simply for protecting legal intellectual property.
2 months ago
Average Positive Brisbane
My process felt structured but low-stress. I started with a recruiter or HR-style touchpoint, and then I moved into interviews with technical or hiring managers where the conversation stayed professional and straightforward. Several rounds leaned heavily on discussing what I’d done before and what they expected from someone joining the team, rather than trying to dive into obscure problems.
There were also moments where the atmosphere stood out as genuinely supportive. In one interview, the engineers were smooth and quick to respond, and they made it clear that if I had questions, I could ask without hesitation—there was a cooperative energy, like they were trying to help me understand rather than just evaluate me. Another part of the process had a “let’s talk” feel where they answered a lot of my questions after I’d reviewed their materials, and overall it just didn’t feel heavy.
3 months ago
Average Positive Kitchener, ON
My process started with an HR screening where I talked through my background and why I was interested in the role. After that, I moved into a technica…
4 months ago
Average Neutral Hong Kong
My first step was pretty straightforward—an interview that felt more like a resume-based conversation than a whiteboard test. For example, I was asked…
4 months ago
Average Neutral Perth, Western Australia
I remember the interview sequence as a pretty traditional progression. It began with an early phone conversation focused on my background and interest…
Unlock every Software Engineer interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Initial HR Screening
The interview process typically begins with an HR screening call that focuses on the candidate's background and interest in the role, often described as friendly and conversational. This initial step sets the tone for the rest of the process, allowing candidates to feel at ease while discussing their experiences.
HR screeningConversationalBackground
Technical Interviews
Candidates can expect multiple technical interviews that assess their engineering knowledge and problem-solving skills, often involving specific scenarios related to their past projects. The atmosphere is generally supportive, with interviewers encouraging questions and clarifications, although some candidates noted instances of more intense questioning.
Behavioral interviews are a key component, focusing on teamwork, collaboration, and how candidates align with the company's values. Interviewers often ask situational questions to gauge how candidates handle various work scenarios, emphasizing a fit for the team and company culture.
Behavioral questionsTeamworkCultural fit
Interview Structure and Flow
The interview process is generally well-structured and organized, with clear communication about timelines and expectations throughout. Candidates reported a predictable flow from HR to technical discussions, which helps maintain a sense of professionalism and reduces stress.
The overall atmosphere during interviews is often described as friendly and low-stress, although some candidates experienced varying levels of professionalism from interviewers. Positive interactions can enhance the experience, while negative encounters may leave candidates feeling undervalued.
Candidates frequently noted delays in follow-up communication after interviews, which can lead to frustration and uncertainty. While initial interactions are often prompt, the time taken to provide feedback or decisions can vary significantly, impacting the overall experience.