Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at AECOM, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process felt structured but low-stress. I started with a recruiter or HR-style touchpoint, and then I moved into interviews with technical or hiring managers where the conversation stayed professional and straightforward. Several rounds leaned heavily on discussing what I’d done before and what they expected from someone joining the team, rather than trying to dive into obscure problems.
My first step was pretty straightforward—an interview that felt more like a resume-based conversation than a whiteboard test. For example, I was asked about my background and projects, including what I’d done academically, and they pulled questions from my resume as the main anchor. At one stage, it was a face-to-face conversation with no written component, and the topics ranged from basic technical concepts tied to common references I’d listed to questions about my capstone and final-year work.
The interview process typically begins with an HR screening call that focuses on the candidate's background and interest in the role, often described as friendly and conversational. This initial step sets the tone for the rest of the process, allowing candidates to feel at ease while discussing their experiences.
Candidates can expect multiple technical interviews that assess their engineering knowledge and problem-solving skills, often involving specific scenarios related to their past projects. The atmosphere is generally supportive, with interviewers encouraging questions and clarifications, although some candidates noted instances of more intense questioning.
Behavioral interviews are a key component, focusing on teamwork, collaboration, and how candidates align with the company's values. Interviewers often ask situational questions to gauge how candidates handle various work scenarios, emphasizing a fit for the team and company culture.
The interview process is generally well-structured and organized, with clear communication about timelines and expectations throughout. Candidates reported a predictable flow from HR to technical discussions, which helps maintain a sense of professionalism and reduces stress.
The overall atmosphere during interviews is often described as friendly and low-stress, although some candidates experienced varying levels of professionalism from interviewers. Positive interactions can enhance the experience, while negative encounters may leave candidates feeling undervalued.
Candidates frequently noted delays in follow-up communication after interviews, which can lead to frustration and uncertainty. While initial interactions are often prompt, the time taken to provide feedback or decisions can vary significantly, impacting the overall experience.