Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Advanced Micro Devices, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After an HR screening, I went straight into a small loop of Zoom interviews with engineers at different levels and then a hiring-manager conversation. Most of what we covered centered on my past work: how I built and debugged software on Linux, what embedded development looked like for me, and how I approached computer networking fundamentals. I also talked through specific project experiences in detail, with interviewers following up based on my answers rather than letting things stay high level.
My process started with a recruiter conversation, then I moved into one technical round that was pretty focused. In my case it was remote and interview-style felt fairly standard—mostly technical questions tied to the role rather than elaborate system design.
The interview process typically begins with an HR screening followed by a series of technical interviews, often including both one-on-one and panel formats. Candidates noted that the timeline was generally organized, with clear communication throughout the stages.
Interviews heavily emphasized foundational knowledge in data structures, algorithms, and low-level system concepts, often including specific discussions on embedded systems, verification, and hardware-related topics. Candidates were expected to demonstrate both theoretical understanding and practical application.
Candidates experienced coding interviews that ranged from basic algorithmic challenges to more complex system design problems, often requiring them to explain their reasoning and approach. The difficulty varied, but many found the questions to be fair yet challenging.
Behavioral interviews focused on past experiences, project details, and how candidates handled specific situations, with an emphasis on storytelling and clarity. Interviewers sought to understand candidates' thought processes and contributions rather than just technical skills.
The overall difficulty of the interviews was described as moderate to high, with some candidates feeling pressure from the fast-paced nature of the questioning. While many found the experience to be structured and fair, others noted that the outcome could depend on the specific interviewer's engagement and focus.
Candidates appreciated timely feedback and clear communication throughout the process, which helped them gauge their performance and next steps. However, some reported inconsistencies in the experience based on the interviewers' styles and the alignment of their backgrounds with the role requirements.