Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Product Manager at Adobe, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I started with a first-round interview with the hiring manager for an intern Product Manager role. It was mostly behavioral questions—no technical questions and no product case. It felt straightforward, more about how I’d worked with others and how I’d handled past situations than about product execution.
For a Senior PM role on an internal AI product, the recruiter set the expectation that the first round would be technical and that the role was brand new with limited context from the hiring manager. I prepared for that, since I’ve spent years as a technical PM working closely with engineering and architecture.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter screen, followed by a hiring manager interview, and culminates in a panel interview involving multiple stakeholders. Candidates noted that the flow was generally straightforward, although some experienced back-to-back interviews that felt intense.
Most interviews emphasized behavioral questions and product sense, assessing candidates on their past experiences and how they approach product-related challenges. Candidates were often asked to articulate their reasoning and decision-making processes in product scenarios.
Some candidates encountered technical assessments, particularly around SQL or basic technical concepts related to product management, though the emphasis varied by role. Candidates reported mixed experiences, with some feeling unprepared for unexpected technical questions.
Interviews often assessed candidates' communication skills and their ability to collaborate across functions. Candidates were evaluated on how well they could explain product decisions and engage with different stakeholders.
Candidates frequently reported long gaps between interview stages and a lack of follow-up communication, leading to feelings of frustration and uncertainty. Many expressed disappointment over the absence of timely updates or closure after the process.
The overall difficulty of the interviews was described as medium, with some candidates feeling challenged yet supported. However, experiences varied widely, with some candidates feeling that the process was respectful and organized, while others felt it was disjointed and lacking structure.