My first step was a very pleasant 30-minute phone call with the recruiter. The conversation was friendly and mostly about getting to know me, with questions that were grounded in my background. After that, I had a 30-minute behavioral interview with a manager.
That second conversation was the part I didn’t enjoy as much. It felt noticeably non-personal and more like a checklist than a real dialogue, and I remember feeling disappointed because it lacked the kind of natural back-and-forth I prefer. Nothing was objectively “wrong” with the questions, and the setting stayed polite, but the overall vibe didn’t match what I was looking for.
> 1 year
Average Negative Newcastle upon Tyne, England
My interview process felt unusually long and filled with gaps in communication. It started with a phone interview involving the local recruiter, then progressed through HR and a director, and eventually pulled me into conversations with people at the American head office in Texas. Along the way I also spoke with managers and technical people.
The hardest part wasn’t the interviews themselves so much as how disconnected everyone seemed. The local recruiter wasn’t sure about what American HR was planning, HR didn’t have the same picture as the managers, and the technical interviewers didn’t know the roadmap managers were working toward. Even the people interviewing me weren’t certain about the long-term direction in the UK after the acquisition by Fortive. I got the overall sense that the process was being used like a trial run to see how things went while they hired a few people there.
> 1 year
Easy Neutral Austin, TX
My process was straightforward and, overall, fairly easy. It started with a focus on my past projects and general computer experience, then moved into…
> 1 year
Difficult Positive New Orleans, LA
The journey started with a non-technical phone interview with recruiting. After that, the process turned into tests: first an unmonitored IQ and perso…
> 1 year
Easy Positive United States
After I applied, HR emailed me about two online assessments: a personality test and an IQ-like test that took about 15 minutes with 50 questions. Then…
Unlock every Software Engineer interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Initial Screening & Assessments
The interview process typically begins with online assessments, including personality and IQ-style tests, which candidates must complete before progressing to interviews. Many candidates noted the repetition of these tests, as they are often required to retake them in person or via webcam.
Online assessmentsIQ testPersonality test
Recruiter Interaction
Candidates generally reported a friendly and engaging initial phone call with recruiters, focusing on their backgrounds and motivations. However, experiences varied regarding follow-up communication, with some candidates feeling left in the dark about their application status.
Recruiter callCommunicationBackground discussion
Technical & Behavioral Interviews
The interview rounds often included a mix of technical and behavioral questions, with a strong emphasis on behavioral fit rather than deep technical challenges. Candidates experienced a range of interview styles, from structured and checklist-like to more conversational and relaxed.
Behavioral interviewTechnical questionsStructured format
Panel Interviews
Some candidates participated in panel interviews with multiple managers, which could last several hours. These sessions were described as friendly but sometimes felt intense due to the number of interviewers and the structured nature of the discussions.
The overall experience varied significantly among candidates, with some describing the process as smooth and welcoming, while others found it disorganized and confusing, particularly regarding the alignment of interviewers and the clarity of the hiring process.
Process flowDisorganizationCandidate experience
Outcome & Feedback
Many candidates did not receive offers, and those who did often expressed frustration with the timing and clarity of feedback. Some felt that the decision-making process was opaque, leading to a sense of wasted time or uncertainty about their performance.