Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Abbott, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After an initial recruiter call, I moved into a couple of online interviews. The first was a more general, introductory conversation with a manager, and the next was with someone focused on training. Overall, it felt organized and straightforward, and I remember the process as pretty average in difficulty—more about understanding how I worked than trying to catch me out.
I had a relatively smooth, low-friction sequence. It began with a phone screen where the questions were straightforward, then I moved into a video call. The flow felt transparent, and I got quick responses between steps. The people I spoke with were friendly, and the whole thing had an easy, conversational tone.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter call focusing on background and scheduling, followed by a brief conversation with the hiring manager. Candidates noted that this initial step is generally straightforward and sets the tone for the subsequent interviews.
Most candidates experienced multiple rounds of interviews that emphasized behavioral questions and cultural fit, often exploring past work experiences and teamwork dynamics. The focus was on assessing how candidates would integrate with the team rather than purely technical skills.
Technical interviews varied in depth, with some candidates facing rigorous coding challenges and scenario-based questions, while others found the technical focus lighter than expected. The interviews often included discussions around practical engineering topics and problem-solving approaches.
Several candidates reported participating in panel-style interviews where multiple interviewers assessed their responses, leading to a mix of technical and behavioral questioning. The structure of these interviews could feel unpredictable, depending on the interviewers' styles.
Communication throughout the process was inconsistent for many candidates, with some experiencing long delays between interview stages and a lack of timely feedback. This often led to frustration and uncertainty about their standing in the hiring process.
Candidates generally described the interview experience as average in difficulty, with a focus on fit rather than high-pressure technical assessments. However, many expressed disappointment in the lack of offers and the overall organization of the process.