Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Wood, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My first step was simple and fairly close to the start of the process: I had a phone call, then moved to an online interview, and finally there was an in-person meeting to get to know me in a more direct way. That progression made the whole thing feel low-pressure at the beginning, and the questions stayed grounded in my skills and knowledge from earlier experience.
My process was fast and felt tightly coordinated. I went through written and interview stages as part of a single-day flow, then I heard back quickly afterward—so quickly it almost felt like the next step was already lined up. The first written assessment didn’t feel too hard, and that set a better tone for the rest of the day.
The interview process typically starts with an HR conversation, followed by technical interviews and sometimes a group exercise. Candidates noted a mix of formats, including video calls, in-person meetings, and assessment days that included both technical and behavioral components.
Candidates experienced a range of technical questioning, often delving deeply into engineering fundamentals and specific project-related topics. The technical interviews were described as rigorous, with a clear expectation for candidates to articulate their thought processes and problem-solving approaches.
Interviews often emphasized behavioral questions and discussions about past experiences, aiming to assess cultural fit and alignment with the company's values. Candidates felt that their backgrounds were explored in depth, with a focus on how they handled challenges and learned from experiences.
Some candidates participated in group exercises, such as building activities or presentations, which assessed both technical skills and communication abilities. These activities were designed to evaluate how candidates collaborate and articulate their ideas under observation.
The level of engagement from interviewers varied, with some candidates noting a conversational tone while others felt a lack of two-way dialogue. Overall, candidates appreciated when interviewers were respectful and made an effort to create a comfortable atmosphere.
Many candidates did not receive offers, but most reported a generally positive experience despite the outcome. Feedback was often prompt, and candidates appreciated the clarity of the process, even when it did not lead to an offer.