Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for QA Engineer at Veeam, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I went through a fairly heavy, multi-round process that felt like it kept stacking up the steps. It started with a homework technical assignment, and after that I had a technical interview where I answered pre-made questions online while staying on a call. That round was pretty rigid in format, and it was very task-focused.
After a recruiter stage, I landed in a longer QA-style screening that started with a technical take-home exercise. The questions centered on estimating something like the number of a well-known mechanical scale type in the Czech Republic, plus how I’d test an electric scooter before it was safe to release. The format pushed me to be explicit about approach, not just give an answer.
Candidates typically start with a technical homework assignment focused on QA tasks, such as finding bugs in software or estimating testing scenarios, which requires thorough documentation and reasoning. This initial task sets the tone for the rest of the interview process and is often perceived as demanding.
The interview process includes multiple technical screening rounds that assess networking fundamentals, operating systems knowledge, and logical reasoning through timed tests and discussions. Candidates should prepare for detailed questions on topics like DNS, DHCP, and IP addressing.
Final interviews often involve a panel of interviewers and can last up to two hours, focusing on technical questions, logic puzzles, and QA reasoning. Candidates should expect a rigorous evaluation with limited room for error, as the panel format is designed to deeply assess technical capabilities.
Candidates frequently report a lack of meaningful feedback throughout the process, leading to frustration and uncertainty about their performance. Many express disappointment over generic responses or no feedback at all after completing assignments or interviews.
The overall atmosphere of the interviews can vary, with some candidates experiencing a dismissive tone or unprofessional interactions that detract from the evaluation process. Despite the structured format, the emotional intensity and perceived pressure can impact candidate performance.
The interview process can be lengthy, often stretching over several weeks with pauses between stages, which can lead to anxiety and uncertainty for candidates. It's important to be prepared for a drawn-out timeline and to follow up for updates.