Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Uline, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
Before I ever got to an interview, I had to complete a stack of assessments that felt disconnected from the role. One of them was a sales aptitude test packed with sales terminology, even though I was applying for a software engineering role. When I pushed back, I was told it was meant to measure speed and agility, but the explanation didn’t really connect to what I’d be doing day to day. On top of that, the interview itself included additional timed assessments, and when I asked what they were measuring, nobody could clearly explain how the results tied to the job.
I did an in-person campus recruiting interview and was sent through a set of basic screens right there. I had to complete a cognitive assessment along with some JavaScript questions and DSA questions. The interviewer was nice and the questions didn’t feel wildly difficult, but I still walked in underprepared for how much they expected me to handle on the spot.
Candidates often face a significant number of assessments before any interviews, including cognitive tests, behavioral exams, and even unrelated evaluations like sales aptitude, which can feel disconnected from the software engineering role.
The interview process typically includes an initial HR screening followed by technical discussions, but many candidates noted a lack of hands-on coding questions, leading to uncertainty about the evaluation criteria.
While candidates appreciated timely communication regarding decisions, many expressed frustration over the lack of meaningful feedback after interviews, which left them feeling unsatisfied with the process.
The in-person interviews often involved multiple back-to-back sessions, which some found intense and tiring, with a focus on both technical and behavioral questions but lacking clarity on the role's expectations.
Many candidates felt underprepared for the breadth of topics covered during interviews, particularly in technical areas, emphasizing the need for thorough review of relevant technologies and concepts.
The overall experience was described as tedious and sometimes disjointed, with candidates feeling that the extensive assessments did not align with the actual job responsibilities, leading to a sense of disconnect.