Automated Pre-Screening & Coding Assessment
Candidates typically receive an automated email inviting them to a timed coding assessment that often lacks human review, leading to a feeling of impersonality in the process.

Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Speechify, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I went through a very automation-heavy Speechify Software Engineer process that felt invasive and typically ended without feedback, mostly driven by a single timed, proctored coding task.
I experienced Speechify’s assessment as a highly impersonal, AI-assisted but privacy-invasive proctored challenge right after applying, and it ended without an offer.
Candidates typically receive an automated email inviting them to a timed coding assessment that often lacks human review, leading to a feeling of impersonality in the process.
The coding assessments are generally proctored, requiring candidates to keep their camera on and screen recorded, with strict rules against using AI tools or external references, which can create a high-pressure environment.
Candidates face challenging technical tasks often involving refactoring or specific implementations, with some reporting issues related to the provided development environment that hindered their performance.
Many candidates report a lack of feedback after assessments, leading to frustration and a sense of being left in the dark regarding their performance and next steps.
Some candidates experience a more traditional multi-round interview process that includes technical interviews and discussions with HR or senior leadership, although success often hinges on later-stage performance.
Interviews often include behavioral assessments to gauge cultural fit, with some candidates noting that these conversations felt more relaxed compared to the technical assessments.