My interview was fairly conventional: it combined behavioral questions about me with a case built to see how I think. The behavioral part felt similar to what I’d encountered at other companies—focused on who I was, how I worked, and the story behind my experiences. After that, the case work came in as the main test, and it didn’t feel like it was trying to trick me as much as pressure-test my reasoning.
The case itself was framed as an evaluation of thinking process. I had to talk through my approach rather than just land on a final answer. The overall experience felt like a normal consulting interview journey: clear enough to follow, but still dependent on how convincingly I could reason out loud.
2 months ago
Difficult Neutral Netherlands
My process felt clearly tiered and heavy on case work. After the recruiter conversation, I moved into a sequence that included behavioral and fit-style interviews, and then I hit the main case study round. The case itself was designed to test how I think—how I structure ambiguity and talk through tradeoffs—followed by follow-up interviews where seniors managers probed further.
The most intense part for me was the additional testing segment: I had a dedicated 60-minute test after the case and interviews, and only then did I reach the partner round. That last conversation was more strategic and business-aware, but the overall vibe didn’t always feel encouraging; at times it seemed like some interviewers were disengaged or less engaged than I expected. It was also all remote for me over Zoom, which made everything feel a bit less natural than I’d hoped.
2 months ago
Average Positive Manchester City Centre, England
I got moved through the early stages quickly, and the speed surprised me. After the initial step, I completed an SHL assessment and then booked the re…
2 months ago
Easy Negative Luxembourg
I started with an HR screening call, which quickly set the tone for what they cared about most: my background, my motivation for consulting, and how I…
3 months ago
Difficult Neutral Amsterdam
I’d already completed an SHL assessment before moving forward, and the timeline was unusually fast. The assessment and then the interview step were sc…
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Timeline
The interview process is generally tiered, starting with an HR screening followed by behavioral interviews, case studies, and sometimes additional assessments. The timeline can vary, with some candidates experiencing quick progression while others face long waits between stages.
HR screeningtiered processtimeline variability
Behavioral & Fit Interviews
Candidates can expect a strong emphasis on behavioral questions that assess fit with PwC's values, focusing on teamwork, problem-solving, and past experiences. These interviews often require candidates to connect their stories to the firm's expectations.
behavioral questionsvalues alignmentSTAR method
Case Study Component
The case study rounds are designed to evaluate candidates' reasoning and problem-solving abilities under pressure, rather than just arriving at the correct answer. Candidates are encouraged to articulate their thought processes clearly throughout these discussions.
case studyproblem-solvingreasoning
Assessment Tests
Some candidates undergo preliminary assessments, such as SHL tests or video interviews, which serve as initial gatekeepers before moving to the main interview rounds. These assessments can feel mechanical and may add pressure due to their structured nature.
SHL assessmentvideo interviewmechanical format
Interview Atmosphere & Engagement
The overall atmosphere during interviews can vary, with some candidates noting a lack of engagement from interviewers, while others report a more conversational and professional tone. This can impact the candidate's experience and comfort level.
interviewer engagementatmosphereprofessional tone
Communication & Feedback
Candidates often experience delays in communication regarding their application status, which can lead to frustration. Clear and timely feedback is not always provided, leaving some candidates feeling uncertain about their performance and the next steps.