Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Navi, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I started with a referral and then went straight into an HR screening. That first round was very front-end flavored—JavaScript questions that leaned on things like polyfills, schema validation, React hooks, plus some CSS topics.
My process ended up being four rounds and felt structured from the start. The first round was DSA, with two medium LeetCode-style questions (the kinds you see in Striver-style problem sets). The second round was a low-level design task where I had to design an in-memory database and reason about multiple threads.
The interview process typically consists of 3 to 5 rounds, starting with a coding or DSA round, followed by design discussions and HR interviews. The timeline is generally clear and structured, with candidates noting that the process felt organized despite varying outcomes.
Most candidates experienced a strong emphasis on coding and data structures/algorithms (DSA), with questions often drawn from LeetCode-style problems. The difficulty ranged from medium to hard, and candidates were expected to demonstrate problem-solving skills effectively.
Several reports highlighted a low-level design (LLD) round where candidates were asked to design systems or components, requiring a solid understanding of architecture and reasoning. This round often followed initial coding assessments and was noted for its depth and complexity.
The final rounds typically included behavioral and cultural fit interviews, focusing on candidates' past experiences and alignment with company values. These rounds were described as straightforward, often concluding the technical assessments.
Candidates reported inconsistencies in communication regarding their progress and feedback throughout the interview process. Some experienced last-minute cancellations or unclear reasons for rejections, leading to frustration and a feeling of instability.
The overall difficulty of the interviews was described as average to hard, with candidates expressing that the experience felt demanding, especially in maintaining focus during challenging rounds. Many noted that the process could feel intense, but the format was generally coherent.
