My process started with a recruiter/HR touchpoint and then moved into a longer interview that felt very much like an organized panel. When I finally got on the clock, the session ran long enough that it included a direct conversation with an HR generalist at the end, bringing the total time to roughly two hours. The format was a mix of behavioral questions using a STAR-style structure and job-relevant questions based on the responsibilities in the role.
What stood out was how much effort the interviewers put into keeping things clear and smooth. I met people across the hiring side—someone in the role, my reporting manager, and a director—so the discussion covered both how I’d work day to day and how I’d fit into the team. Early questions were framed around behavioral examples and role alignment, while later parts leaned more technical, tied directly to what the job description said.
6 months ago
Average Positive London, England
After I applied, I heard back quickly and spoke with HR to talk through expectations for the project manager role. The conversation felt transparent and fairly straightforward, and it was mostly about fit—what I’d done before and what I was looking for—without getting overly tricky. A short while later I moved into another round where I learned more about what the job actually looked like day to day, and that helped me get a clearer sense of the role.
The next step included a short presentation component. I had about ten minutes to present, and the questions around it were tied to my motivation and my understanding of the company. I also had a separate interview session focused on communication and organization, where I prepared a 10–15 minute presentation on those techniques. Throughout, the people I met were welcoming, and even when the process required a bit of prep, it didn’t feel hostile—just structured.
6 months ago
Average Neutral Cincinnati, OH
I applied and was contacted by HR for an initial exploratory conversation, then I went in person for manager interviews. The in-person part stood out …
10 months ago
Difficult Negative Leuven
The start of my process was honestly frustrating. I heard back immediately with a lot of enthusiasm, but scheduling didn’t move for about two to three…
> 1 year
Average Positive United Kingdom
After an HR conversation, I ended up interviewing with the head of Training & Development and then with the department head. The process felt more str…
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Rounds
The interview process typically involves multiple rounds, starting with an HR conversation followed by interviews with hiring managers and team members. Candidates can expect a mix of behavioral, technical, and presentation components throughout the stages.
HR interviewManager interviewsPresentation
Behavioral & Role Fit Questions
Interviewers focus heavily on behavioral questions using a STAR-style format, assessing candidates' past experiences and how they align with the role's responsibilities. Expect discussions that clarify how your background fits into the company's needs.
STARBehavioral questionsRole alignment
Presentation Component
Candidates are often required to prepare and deliver a presentation, which is a significant part of the evaluation process. This component assesses not only communication skills but also candidates' understanding of the role and company.
The overall atmosphere is generally friendly and welcoming, with interviewers aiming for clear and constructive discussions. However, some candidates noted inconsistencies in communication and scheduling that could lead to frustration.
Candidates should be prepared to discuss their knowledge of Medpace, including its operations and how it compares to other companies in the industry. This reflects the interviewers' interest in candidates' genuine motivation for the role.
Company knowledgeMotivationIndustry comparison
Outcome & Reflections
While many candidates did not receive offers, they often reflected positively on the experience, valuing the clarity it provided about the role and the company's expectations. The process is seen as structured, though some felt it could be more selective.
Interview outcomeCandidate reflectionsStructured process