Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Macquarie Group, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process started with screening and then moved into a technical interview. The recruiter and the interviewers came across as professional and friendly, but I ran into confusion about interview logistics that threw off the timing—my discussion started late and then felt a little rushed once it did begin.
I went through a pretty recruiter-driven path: after applying, there was a phone conversation, and then an Assessment Centre. The whole process moved quickly enough that it didn’t feel dragged out—under two months for me—and most of what I experienced was behavioural-focused, plus a group task when I got to the centre. The setup at the Assessment Centre split the time: part of the session was with senior developers, and part was a scenario work area where I interacted with other interviewees. There was also a talk from someone recently graduated from the program, which gave the day a more “show and explain” feel rather than pure testing.
Candidates typically experience a multi-stage interview process that includes initial screenings, technical interviews, and behavioral assessments, often spanning several weeks to months. The structure is generally clear, but some candidates noted inconsistencies in communication regarding timelines and next steps.
Technical interviews often involve coding challenges, system design questions, and whiteboarding sessions that assess problem-solving skills and engineering thought processes. Candidates should prepare for a range of technical topics, including algorithms, data structures, and system architecture.
Behavioral interviews focus heavily on cultural fit and collaboration, with interviewers assessing how candidates align with team values and work styles. Candidates are encouraged to prepare examples that demonstrate their teamwork and communication skills.
Candidates frequently reported challenges with communication and feedback throughout the interview process, often experiencing delays or a lack of clarity regarding their status. This can lead to frustration and uncertainty about the outcome.
The tone of interviews can vary significantly, with some candidates experiencing friendly and professional interactions, while others faced dismissive or confrontational attitudes from interviewers. This aspect can greatly impact the overall candidate experience.
Many candidates reflected on their preparation, noting areas where they felt underprepared or misaligned with the interview expectations, particularly in technical assessments. It’s advisable to review both technical skills and personal experiences relevant to the role.