Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Business Analyst at Macquarie Group, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
The process started quickly in terms of scheduling, and the whole setup felt straightforward. I had a technical skills test component that was genuinely challenging, not just a quick check—by the time I sat down for it, I knew it would take focused effort. After that, there were additional rounds that combined practical and technical questioning with a more behavioral-oriented component.
My process was very interview-forward. I had two rounds of interviews and both were in-person, with a lot of structured behavioral questioning mixed with role fit. I remember being pushed to explain why I wanted the role and to talk through my background in the retail banking space in a pretty direct way.
The interview process typically begins with an HR screening, followed by a series of structured interviews that include technical assessments and behavioral questioning. Candidates noted that the timeline for feedback can be lengthy, often taking several weeks after the final interview.
Candidates experienced a challenging technical skills test that included SQL questions and problem-solving tasks, often requiring detailed explanations of their thought processes. This round was seen as a significant part of the evaluation, with some candidates feeling it was the most difficult aspect of the process.
Behavioral interviews were prominent, focusing on candidates' past experiences and how they align with the company's culture and values. Interviewers often pushed for specific examples and clarity in responses, emphasizing the importance of communication skills.
A psychometric assessment is typically required early in the process, serving as a gatekeeper to further interviews. Candidates reported that the results significantly influenced their progression, adding an element of uncertainty to the timeline.
Overall, candidates rated the difficulty of the interviews as average to difficult, with some describing the experience as thorough and structured. However, there were instances of frustration due to a lack of communication after interviews, leading to uncertainty about outcomes.
Some candidates participated in group activities or panel discussions that tested collaboration and negotiation skills, rather than traditional one-on-one interviews. This format required candidates to demonstrate their ability to work with others under pressure.