Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at LiveRamp, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I was told the process would be three rounds, with two coding-focused interviews plus an HR conversation. The first round was centered on DSA and problem solving, and they walked me through two medium LeetCode-style questions. The next technical round was similar but slightly heavier: one medium coding question and more DSA/problem-solving.
After a recruiter call, I got pulled into a straightforward sequence that looked like hiring-manager conversations paired with technical rounds. The flow I saw was recruiter contact first, then an initial technical interview, a second technical interview, and finally another hiring-manager discussion where they covered a mix of topics beyond just coding.
The interview process typically starts with a recruiter call, followed by one or more technical interviews, and often culminates in an onsite loop. Candidates have reported varying experiences with scheduling, including some facing significant delays or cancellations.
Most candidates experience multiple coding rounds that focus on data structures and algorithms, often using LeetCode-style questions. The time pressure in these rounds can be intense, and candidates noted that incomplete solutions can negatively impact their chances.
In addition to coding, candidates often participate in system design discussions and behavioral interviews, which are separate from technical assessments. These rounds emphasize communication and problem-solving skills beyond just coding ability.
Candidates have encountered various assessment formats, including online coding challenges, timed tests, and even presentations. Some found the assessments to be unusually difficult or not reflective of typical software engineering tasks.
Many candidates expressed frustration with the lack of communication and feedback throughout the process, particularly after interviews. This often left them feeling uncertain about their performance and the overall evaluation criteria.
While some candidates found the technical challenges manageable, others described the overall experience as chaotic or unprofessional due to scheduling issues and operational friction. The perception of the interview difficulty varied widely among candidates.