Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Lattice, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My early conversations didn’t give me much momentum. The recruiter call was smooth, but when the next step came, I struggled to understand what the “last round” actually was supposed to cover, and I felt like I was missing context.
After the recruiter stage, I ended up in a process that had a strong “build something” component and it felt more engineering-practical than puzzle-heavy. I remember the first part of the technical track being fairly straightforward in theme—RBAC showed up as a topic—and then the process turned into an assignment.
Candidates often report that the initial recruiter conversations can feel like box-checking rather than meaningful evaluations, leading to confusion about the process and expectations for subsequent rounds.
The technical interviews typically involve a mix of practical coding tasks and system design discussions, with a focus on real-world applications rather than abstract puzzles, though the format can vary significantly between candidates.
Many candidates complete take-home projects that require building functional applications, but there are reports of shifting expectations regarding format and timing, which can add stress to the process.
Onsite interviews often include multiple rounds with a combination of technical and behavioral questions, and while some candidates find the atmosphere supportive, others feel pressured by the format of live coding under observation.
Candidates express disappointment over the lack of detailed feedback after the interview process, particularly after investing significant effort in multiple rounds, which can leave them feeling undervalued.
The overall candidate experience is often described as warm and respectful, with a strong emphasis on organizational clarity and culture, although some candidates still feel that the process could be more engaging and less confusing.