Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Consultant at Kpmg India, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process felt efficient at the start and then grew a bit more technical at the end. It began with two separate take-home assignments in Jupyter: one focused on general data science, and the other was a more classic machine learning problem. I put time into getting both notebooks right, because they set the tone for what they wanted to see.
I started with an HR step over Zoom or by email scheduling, where the recruiter kept it relaxed and focused on my background and how I’d fit. After that, I moved into a mix of behavioral and scenario-style conversations. One part centered on how I’d approach a business situation, including things like integration and separation themes, and how I’d think through M&A–type considerations. Along the way, I noticed the interviewers probed after my answers, asking follow-ups that pushed me to explain my logic clearly rather than just give a high-level response.
The interview process typically begins with a relaxed HR screening, either via Zoom or phone, focusing on the candidate's background and fit for the role. This step sets a friendly tone for the subsequent interviews.
Candidates can expect a mix of behavioral and scenario-based questions that assess their reasoning and approach to business situations, particularly around themes like M&A and integration. Interviewers often probe for deeper explanations, emphasizing clarity in thought processes.
The interview process includes technical assessments that may involve coding, SQL, and case presentations, often designed to evaluate problem-solving skills in real-world contexts. Candidates should be prepared for both light technical discussions and deeper technical evaluations.
The final stages of the interview typically involve discussions with senior leadership or partners, focusing on overall fit and alignment with the firm's expectations. Candidates should be ready to articulate their motivations and how their experiences align with the role.
Throughout the process, candidates noted the importance of clear communication and the impact of their explanations on follow-up questions. However, some experienced delays in feedback, which could lead to frustration during the waiting period.
The overall difficulty of the interview process is generally perceived as average, with a structured flow that allows candidates to express their thoughts clearly. While many found the experience supportive, the intensity of the assessments varied, with some candidates feeling pressure during technical evaluations.