Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Intuit, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I went through a multi-round structure where the first technical hurdle was an asynchronous OA-style set of problems: a DSA question, an SQL scenario question, and a regex task implemented in Python. It was the kind of mix that forced me to switch modes quickly—algorithms, then data querying, then pattern matching.
My process started with a recruiter screen that felt pretty casual at first. They covered my background and did the usual fit-style questions, and at some point they even asked for my opinion on AI and related topics—more of a perspective check than a deep technical probe.
Candidates can expect a challenging online assessment consisting of three parts: a DSA problem, an SQL question, and a Bash scripting task, all within a strict time limit of 90 to 120 minutes. The assessment requires quick switching between different problem-solving modes, which can be a significant stressor.
The recruiter stage varies in tone, with some candidates reporting casual conversations while others experienced defensiveness or disinterest. AI-related questions frequently arise, focusing on candidates' usage of AI tools in their projects.
Following the initial assessment, candidates typically face a technical screen focused on their build challenge submissions, where they must explain their code and design choices. The questions often delve into system design and concurrency, requiring a solid understanding of core concepts.
Candidates should prepare for behavioral interviews that emphasize teamwork, collaboration under pressure, and the application of AI in their work. These discussions often tie back to candidates' past experiences and project history.
Many candidates noted a lack of timely communication and feedback throughout the process, leading to frustration, especially after interviews. This can create uncertainty about their standing in the hiring process.
The interview process is perceived as structured but can be lengthy and stressful, with candidates often feeling that the assessment's difficulty exceeds expectations for the role. The experience can vary significantly based on the interviewers' engagement levels.