Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for QA Engineer at Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process started with the recruiter and then moved quickly into a QA Manager phone interview that was around 45 minutes. After that, I got pulled into an in-person meeting that ended up being ridiculously long—several hours with a large group of people. I remember having to request time off just for the day, and the whole commitment felt intense from the start.
It started with three rounds of phone interviews, and then I was invited to Atlanta for an onsite. On site, I met roughly ten people and also went through two written tests, which added a different flavor compared to the phone conversations.
The interview process typically starts with phone screenings followed by an onsite interview that can last several hours, involving multiple rounds with various team members. Candidates noted that the process can feel lengthy and sometimes chaotic, with a lack of clear communication about next steps.
Candidates experienced a heavy emphasis on technical skills, particularly in areas like Java, Selenium, SQL, and automation tools, often through coding exercises and practical discussions. The technical discussions varied in depth, with some candidates feeling the assessments were intense and others finding them more conversational.
Interviews included behavioral discussions that focused on personal motivations and team fit, often with a lighter tone compared to technical rounds. Candidates appreciated the friendly approach of some interviewers, which contributed to a more comfortable atmosphere.
Many candidates expressed frustration over the lack of timely feedback and clarity regarding their status throughout the interview process. Even after completing all rounds, some candidates reported feeling ghosted or receiving vague reassurances without concrete outcomes.
The difficulty level of interviews varied, with some candidates finding the assessments challenging and others feeling they were more straightforward. However, the pressure of long sessions and the need to perform well under scrutiny were common themes across reports.
Onsite interviews sometimes included written tests and logic questions, adding a different dimension to the assessment process. Candidates noted that these elements were unexpected but contributed to a more comprehensive evaluation of their skills.