Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Consultant at Infosys, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My interview experience started in a way that put me at ease—interviewers stayed calm and supportive, and that carried through both the technical and the managerial parts. I remember feeling like the discussions were productive rather than adversarial.
I went through a pretty traditional sequence—two rounds of interview and then HR to wrap up. The first round was mostly technical, and it felt like it rewarded practice: I was expected to discuss and write code, not just talk about concepts. The second round moved more toward behavioral, and I remember the tone shifting into how I approached work and communication.
The interview process typically follows a structured three-round format: technical, managerial, and HR, often completed within 2.5 to 3 weeks. Candidates noted that scheduling was generally well-coordinated, though some experienced delays during the HR phase.
Technical interviews are hands-on and cover a range of topics including Java, Spring Boot, AWS, and project-specific questions, often requiring candidates to demonstrate practical application and understanding of their past work. The depth of questions can vary, with some candidates finding them challenging yet aligned with their experience.
The managerial round emphasizes situational and behavioral questions, focusing on candidates' project experiences, problem-solving abilities, and communication styles. This round is designed to assess how candidates would fit into the team and handle responsibilities rather than just technical knowledge.
The HR round is generally straightforward, focusing on logistical details such as salary and location expectations, with some candidates noting that negotiation may be limited. The tone is typically collaborative, but experiences with responsiveness and flexibility can vary.
Candidates reported a supportive and calm interview atmosphere, which helped ease the pressure during technical discussions. Interviewers maintained a professional demeanor, fostering a productive dialogue rather than an adversarial one, which contributed to a positive overall experience.
Candidates reflected on the importance of preparing for both technical depth and situational questions, with many wishing they had practiced more on specific frameworks or languages relevant to their role. Understanding the connection between their past projects and the questions asked was crucial for success.
