Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for QA Engineer at Infor, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After a recruiter screening, I ended up going through a multi-round process that felt intentionally structured around both technical competence and fit. The early stage focused on my background and expectations—availability and how I thought about the role—plus some cultural fit and communication. From there I moved into technical interviews where the questions leaned heavily into QA work: testing approach, troubleshooting scenarios, and how I’d handle real-time situations. SQL and automation came up as well, along with manual testing fundamentals and scenario-based discussions.
My process took longer than I expected. I went through four total conversations: a recruiter touchpoint, two technical interviews (one of them was in person), and then a final interview. After that, I waited and waited for an update—about 2–3 months passed before anything came back, and by then I’d already accepted another offer.
The interview process typically involves multiple rounds, starting with a recruiter screening followed by technical interviews and a final HR conversation. Candidates reported varying timelines, with some experiencing delays of several weeks to months before receiving feedback.
Candidates faced a mix of technical assessments, including written exams and panel interviews that focused on QA fundamentals, troubleshooting scenarios, and practical applications of testing strategies. Questions often required candidates to connect their experience to real-world QA challenges.
Interviews included discussions on communication, teamwork, and cultural fit, often connecting back to candidates' previous experiences and how they approach their work. This aspect was emphasized in both HR and managerial conversations.
Candidates reported a broad range of topics covered in interviews, including manual testing, SQL, automation, and software engineering principles. The challenge often lay in managing the breadth of knowledge required across these areas.
The interview environment was generally described as friendly and approachable, with interviewers focused on understanding candidates' thought processes rather than just testing knowledge. This helped create a more comfortable experience for many candidates.
Despite a generally positive interview experience, many candidates did not receive offers, leading to reflections on the disconnect between interview quality and final outcomes. Some expressed frustration over the lengthy wait for feedback after the interviews.