Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Grow Therapy, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process felt smooth and unusually human. I started with a recruiter chat where we talked through the role and what they expected day to day, and it already felt practical rather than generic. After that, about a week later, I moved into a sequence that stayed fairly standard: a hiring manager conversation, then coding, followed by cross-functional discussion and some behavioral questions. Everyone I met came across as friendly and sharp, and they weren’t trying to trip me up so much as understand how I thought.
My first step was a recruiter screen, and then I got an assignment described as a technical writing prompt with a design template provided. The email framed it as something that should take just a few hours, but the scope was so broad and open-ended that I couldn’t really fit it into that window. I ended up spending way longer, trying to cover enough ground to show I could design something resilient and performant.
The interview process typically begins with a recruiter screen that focuses on discussing the role and expectations, setting a practical tone for the subsequent steps. Candidates found this initial conversation to be friendly and informative.
Candidates are often given a take-home assignment that requires significant time investment and may feel vague or open-ended. This assignment is intended to demonstrate coding skills and design thinking but can lead to frustration due to unclear expectations.
The interview loop includes live coding sessions that assess both front-end and back-end skills, with a focus on practical coding tasks relevant to the role. Candidates reported that the questions were fair but emphasized the importance of performance considerations.
A common concern among candidates was the lack of meaningful feedback after interviews, often attributed to company policy. Many felt that the communication could be chaotic, leading to a sense of wasted effort without clear guidance on improvement.
Overall, candidates described the interview atmosphere as friendly and supportive, with interviewers focused on understanding their thought processes rather than trying to trip them up. This positive vibe contributed to a more pleasant experience.
Candidates reflected on their experiences with mixed outcomes; while some received offers, others faced rejections without feedback, leading to disappointment. Many emphasized the importance of feeling respected for their time and effort throughout the process.
