Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Feedzai, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I went through a process that felt fast, structured, and surprisingly respectful of my time. After an initial recruiter conversation, the next step landed about a week later and I moved through technical rounds in a fairly tight sequence. The interviews were clearly designed to test how I thought and how I solved problems, not just whether I could recite theoretical concepts, and the tone stayed professional and relaxed.
My process started with a recruiter call where they introduced the company and walked through what was coming next, and then I had another longer recruiter session that included more questions than I expected. After that, the technical portion kicked off with a live coding interview involving a fairly extensive problem. The prompt came with so much information that it was easy to get momentarily overwhelmed, but the interviewers were friendly and tried to help if I got stuck.
The interview process typically starts with a recruiter call, followed by a technical screen, and then multiple technical rounds, often including coding exercises and system design discussions. Candidates noted that the process felt fast and well-coordinated, with some flexibility shown by the company to accommodate scheduling needs.
Candidates experienced a variety of technical assessments, including live coding interviews and practical coding exercises focused on multi-threading and system design. The emphasis was on problem-solving and practical application rather than theoretical knowledge, with interviewers fostering a supportive environment.
Interviews included system design discussions where candidates were asked to conceptualize and build solutions for real-world scenarios, such as a real-time notification system. This required candidates to demonstrate their understanding of how different components interact within a system.
Candidates had discussions focused on cultural fit and team dynamics, often with leadership-level interviewers. The tone of these conversations was described as respectful and professional, contributing to a positive overall impression of the company culture.
While the technical rounds were challenging, candidates reported that the evaluation criteria sometimes felt misaligned with the job description, leading to confusion about expectations. Overall, the difficulty was viewed as fair, with a focus on assessing practical problem-solving skills.
Candidates expressed that they appreciated the respectful treatment throughout the process, even when they did not receive an offer. Many wished they had better aligned their preparation with the specific technical demands of the role, particularly regarding system knowledge and practical implementation.