Online Assessment
Candidates typically start with a timed online assessment focused on math, statistics, and programming, which can vary in difficulty and format, often requiring quick problem-solving under pressure.

Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Data Scientist at Drw Holdings, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After applying, the first step was an online assessment with a tight time box—around 45 minutes in the versions I saw described—testing probability and stats with some linear algebra mixed in. In my assessment, there were only a couple of questions but they still demanded coding, including a math-and-coding task and something more directly related to KNN. The whole thing was timed enough that I felt the pressure to move quickly rather than polish details.
Before I even reached an interview, I had to clear a combination of tests: a math/stats/programming test followed by an intermediate-level programming assignment. Once I passed those, the process moved into interviews.
Candidates typically start with a timed online assessment focused on math, statistics, and programming, which can vary in difficulty and format, often requiring quick problem-solving under pressure.
Following the assessment, candidates engage in multiple technical interview rounds that delve into quantitative problem-solving, with a strong emphasis on explaining reasoning and applying mathematical concepts relevant to finance and trading.
Initial interviews often include a discussion of the candidate's resume and prior experiences, but the focus quickly shifts to technical skills, with some candidates noting that this part felt less critical than the technical evaluations.
Candidates report a significant emphasis on time management throughout the process, with many feeling that the ability to perform under tight time constraints was a key evaluation criterion.
There are varied experiences regarding the online assessments, with some candidates finding them straightforward while others describe them as challenging and poorly phrased, leading to confusion and time management issues.
Most candidates report not receiving offers, often feeling that the rejection was tied to performance in the assessments and technical rounds, with some expressing uncertainty about how their backgrounds aligned with the company's expectations.