After a recruiter call, I ended up doing a technical screen where the conversation jumped straight into questions tied to my background. I talked through my internship and projects, and the questions then narrowed into MongoDB and SQL, plus the kinds of data structures I’d used or discussed in school and work. The whole vibe felt pretty day-to-day, like they were trying to see whether I could connect my experience to practical problem solving.
A little later, the process expanded into additional rounds. The technical topics and the core discussion points basically got repeated again when I moved to an in-person portion, because the company flew down for the interview. I also had an HR round where I spoke with two HR interviewers, and that added more structure around fit and communication beyond pure technical depth. Overall it felt moderately hard, but not stressful, and the process moved quickly enough that I could tell they were actively progressing me.
> 1 year
Average Positive Barcelona
I went through the usual HR and team coverage, but the experience stood out for very different reasons. My process started with a first conversation with HR, then moved to interviews with the team lead and another HR touchpoint. The second parts felt like they were reading from a script, and when we got to an English-related portion, the HR interviewer clearly didn’t have strong command of the language. The questions didn’t flow naturally, and it honestly felt like they weren’t even fully sure what they were asking.
Even so, I did make it far enough to see a more formal structure around the later stage: interviews with direct work teammates and then with people in responsible-equipment roles. During the process, I noticed they were responsive enough over email to resolve my questions, which made the experience feel more coherent later on, even though the early HR-driven moments were genuinely rough.
> 1 year
Difficult Positive Denmark
My interview process started with two stages—one online and one in person—with tests layered after the first step. After the initial conversation, I c…
> 1 year
Easy Positive Bristol, England
I had a relatively straightforward interview path that mostly emphasized interpersonal fit and my academic background rather than heavy technical test…
> 1 year
Average Positive London, England
I started with an online assessment journey that felt designed to test both how I think and how I function in a group. The process began with an Artic…
Unlock every Software Engineer interview experience
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Timeline
The interview process typically begins with an HR screening, followed by technical interviews and managerial rounds, often spanning several weeks. Candidates noted that the pacing varied, with some experiencing quick feedback while others faced delays.
HR screeningTechnical interviewsManagerial rounds
Technical Assessment Focus
Technical interviews often emphasized practical problem-solving skills, covering topics like SQL, data structures, and engineering fundamentals, with some candidates facing rigorous technical exams that tested depth of knowledge.
SQLData structuresEngineering fundamentals
Behavioral & Fit Interviews
Many candidates encountered rounds focused on interpersonal fit and communication, where interviewers assessed alignment with team dynamics and company culture rather than solely technical skills.
Interpersonal fitCommunicationTeam dynamics
Assessment of Personality & Cognitive Skills
Some candidates underwent psychometric evaluations and personality assessments, which were perceived as significant in determining fit, potentially overshadowing technical evaluations in some cases.
Candidates expressed mixed experiences regarding communication quality throughout the process, with some noting clear and responsive interactions while others felt the initial HR stages lacked coherence and clarity.
Communication qualityFeedbackHR interactions
Overall Difficulty & Competitive Nature
The overall difficulty of the interview process was described as moderate to high, with candidates feeling the competition was intense, especially for technical roles, which contributed to a sense of pressure during evaluations.