After a recruiter call, the process moved quickly into a multi-step format with technical depth. The first interview was largely an introduction round: I talked through my background and experience, gave an overview of the skills and technologies I’d used without going too far into the weeds, and covered the usual topics like why the company and why that role, plus salary expectations. The interview language was German, which shaped how I had to frame my answers.
A bit later, I had a second, deeper technical interview. This one focused on “under the hood” knowledge and required me to explain components rather than just naming services. I was expected to get granular about Databricks and AWS concepts—things like environment separation, the medallion architecture, and governance using Unity Catalogue. We also went into performance topics such as partitioning and Z-ordering, including how liquid clustering fits in. Even comparison-level details came up, like Parquet versus Delta, and the expectation was that I could connect each concept back to how data behaves in practice.
2 months ago
Average Neutral Bengaluru
My interview journey felt very practical and scenario-based from the start. After the recruiter process, I ended up in a sequence of rounds focused on data engineering fundamentals and how I’d reason end-to-end. The topics spanned SQL, Python, Airflow, and cloud work on GCP, with questions that pushed me to not just define concepts but walk through the flow.
In SQL, I worked through joins and window functions, including ranking behavior like dense_rank versus rank. I also had to handle a realistic data-cleaning style problem—finding duplicates and then extracting the highest value per department. Python came next, where the questions were aimed at basic list and dictionary handling and the ability to write small scripts. Airflow then followed, and I explained how DAGs flow, how scheduling works, and what roles XComs and operators play.
2 months ago
Difficult Positive Calcutta
My interview process was smooth and felt deliberately organized, with a clear multi-round structure. It started with an HR screening focused on my com…
2 months ago
Average Neutral Zaventem
My process started with a structured HR screening call where the recruiter talked through the role and my background, then helped me align on what the…
3 months ago
Average Positive India
My first contact with the process was an online interview through the HireVue portal. It felt straightforward: the questions had been shared ahead of …
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Timeline
The interview process typically follows a clear multi-step structure, starting with an HR screening, followed by technical interviews, and culminating in managerial or partner-level discussions. Candidates noted that the pacing was generally consistent, with quick transitions between rounds, often within a couple of days.
HR screeningmulti-stepquick transitions
Technical & Scenario-Based Questions
Candidates experienced a strong focus on technical knowledge, particularly in areas like SQL, Python, and cloud technologies, often requiring them to demonstrate practical problem-solving skills through scenario-based questions. The expectation was to explain concepts in depth and connect them to real-world applications.
SQLPythoncloud technologies
Behavioral & Cultural Fit
Behavioral interviews were a significant component, emphasizing communication skills, teamwork, and cultural alignment with the company. Candidates were often evaluated on how they approached ambiguity and real-world scenarios, rather than just providing correct answers.
behavioralcultural fitcommunication skills
Case Studies & Guesstimates
Many candidates faced case study interviews that tested their analytical and logical reasoning skills, often requiring them to think on their feet and handle business scenarios under pressure. Guesstimates were also a common element, adding to the challenge of demonstrating structured thinking.
case studiesguesstimatesanalytical reasoning
Interview Difficulty & Candidate Reflections
Overall, candidates described the difficulty of the interviews as average to challenging, with many reflecting on the importance of clear communication and structured thinking. Even those who did not receive offers found the experience valuable for identifying areas for improvement.
average difficultycommunicationstructured thinking
Feedback & Communication
Candidates appreciated the clear communication from recruiters throughout the process, including timely updates and actionable feedback after interviews. This transparency contributed to a positive overall experience, even for those who did not receive offers.