After the recruiter step, I ended up doing a sequence of three one-on-one interviews. The first one was with HR, then I met my direct manager, and the final conversation was with the director of the unit. What stood out was that every interview felt like a real discussion rather than something rigid or templated. The people I spoke to were clearly focused on understanding me and how I would fit the team.
The overall pace felt straightforward: three distinct conversations across different levels of the organization, all in a private format. I didn’t feel like I was being rushed through a script, and the atmosphere was more conversational than performative. By the time I finished the last round, I felt like I had a clearer picture of what mattered to them and what the role would likely look like day to day—though I ultimately didn’t receive an offer.
> 1 year
Easy Negative Paris
My process started with a phone call to HR and then a couple of interviews with associates. The conversations were fairly light, but I remember leaving with a strong mismatch between what I asked for and how it was received. HR and the associates told me I was asking too much, even though I believed I was staying within the market range for my school’s typical exit salary.
That feedback was paired with some comments that felt unsettling: they implied they struggled to pay top talent, and even suggested that one reason the brand wasn’t better known was because they’d had to change their name. When I compared it to how another, more established consulting firm handled my case, I felt the contrast was hard to ignore. I didn’t get an offer, and honestly the whole experience left me thinking the compensation conversation was the real blocker rather than my fit for the work.
> 1 year
Difficult Neutral Paris
I first had a telephone call with another consultant related to a cooptation step. After that, I went into a run of three consecutive interviews at th…
> 1 year
Average Positive India
My interview journey consisted of three rounds and felt pretty positive from start to finish. I went through two technical interviews and then a manag…
> 1 year
Positive United States
The process felt very challenging, but it was also surprisingly informative. I remember being asked a lot of technical questions alongside functional …
Interviewed here recently? Add yours to help the next candidate. You'll appear as Anonymous.
What to expect
Distilled from the reports
Interview Structure & Flow
The interview process typically consists of three rounds: an initial HR screening, followed by technical interviews, and concluding with a managerial or HR round. Candidates noted that the flow felt structured and organized, with a mix of conversational and evaluative elements throughout.
HR screeningTechnical interviewsManagerial round
Technical Evaluation
Technical questions are often integrated later in the process, with some candidates experiencing a shift from general fit discussions to more challenging technical assessments. The intensity of these technical rounds can vary, with some candidates finding them demanding and others feeling they lacked depth.
Behavioral questions are a significant part of the interviews, focusing on past experiences and how candidates handle various situations. Many candidates felt that these questions were aimed at assessing cultural fit and alignment with the company's values.
Behavioral questionsCultural fitSTAR method
Communication & Engagement
Candidates reported that the interviewers generally fostered a conversational atmosphere, emphasizing clear communication and engagement. This approach helped candidates feel more at ease, even when faced with challenging questions.
Communication skillsEngagementConversational tone
Compensation Discussion
Discussions around salary expectations surfaced in multiple interviews, with some candidates feeling that their compensation requests were not well-received. This aspect seemed to impact candidates' perceptions of the company's ability to attract top talent.
Candidates expressed mixed feelings about the overall experience, with some appreciating the structured approach while others found it lacking in substance or warmth. Feedback post-interview varied, with some receiving automated rejections and others feeling there was room for improvement in communication.
Overall experienceFeedback qualityRejection process