Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Checkr, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
My process started with a recruiter call, and after that I moved into a more multi-round onsite-style setup with multiple interviews. A couple of the conversations felt genuinely easy to connect with—the interviewers were engaged and it felt like they’d be good coworkers. The whole process still felt fair overall, even though it took a while to get through everything.
My first interaction was a recruiter screening call, and it set a weird tone immediately. The interviewer was standoffish and seemed uninterested in having an actual conversation. Things escalated fast, and the call felt hostile enough that I cut it short after just a few minutes.
Initial recruiter calls varied significantly in tone and effectiveness, with some candidates experiencing a friendly and informative conversation, while others felt standoffish or unprofessional. This inconsistency set the stage for the overall interview experience.
Candidates typically underwent a technical screen involving coding exercises that focused on practical engineering tasks rather than algorithmic puzzles, though the quality of the interviewers varied, affecting the overall experience.
The onsite interviews often included multiple back-to-back technical sessions that assessed coding, system design, and architecture, but the atmosphere could range from collaborative to hostile, impacting candidates' perceptions of the company culture.
Many candidates reported a lack of clear communication and follow-up throughout the process, leading to frustration and a sense of disrespect for their time, especially after extensive interviews.
The difficulty level of interviews was generally high, focusing on real-world engineering challenges, but some candidates felt the expectations were misaligned with the job descriptions or their experiences, leading to confusion.
Candidates expressed mixed feelings about the overall experience, with some appreciating the structured approach while others felt it lacked respect and closure, often ending without meaningful feedback or resolution.