Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at ASML, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I started with a HireVue video round where I recorded answers to a few prompts on my own time. It felt straightforward and low-stakes, mostly centered on common questions about me rather than deep technical material. The weird part was simply talking to the camera instead of a real person, but the questions themselves didn’t demand anything unexpected.
After I waited a while after applying—first interview in May and then a long silence—I eventually got another virtual interview with the hiring manager. The meeting was scheduled as a 45-minute call, but it didn’t feel like a balanced conversation. The hiring manager asked me a single question early, then spent most of the time talking about himself and the role.
The interview process typically begins with a HireVue video assessment, where candidates respond to behavioral prompts within a set time limit. This stage is designed to evaluate communication skills and fit rather than technical depth, often leaving candidates feeling it lacks interactivity.
Initial conversations with recruiters often focus on logistical aspects and salary discussions rather than a deep exploration of the candidate's background or fit for the role, leading to a somewhat transactional feel.
Subsequent technical interviews involve discussions with engineers that emphasize practical experience and problem-solving related to the candidate's background, rather than abstract theoretical questions. The pace can be brisk, requiring candidates to articulate their thought processes clearly.
Interviews with hiring managers can vary in engagement level, with some candidates experiencing a more one-sided conversation where the manager dominates the discussion. However, others find these interactions to be insightful and focused on mutual fit.
The overall interview process is generally structured and organized, with clear expectations communicated throughout. Candidates appreciate the transparency and the logical progression from one stage to the next, although some report feeling rushed during technical assessments.
Candidates often leave the process without an offer, but many express that the experience was respectful and provided clarity on the evaluation criteria. Some reflect on the need for more interactive or engaging formats, particularly in the early stages.