Recruiter Experience
Candidates reported mixed experiences with recruiters, often feeling that initial screens focused more on salary discussions than on assessing technical skills or motivations, which impacted the overall candidate experience.

Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at ASML, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I interviewed for the Software Engineer role twice, and while the overall difficulty felt average, the recruiter experience was the major drag and it led to a disappointing process.
I went through a fairly smooth, well-organized ASML process for Software Engineering that mixed resume-based discussion with practical technical checks over a short sequence of rounds.
Candidates reported mixed experiences with recruiters, often feeling that initial screens focused more on salary discussions than on assessing technical skills or motivations, which impacted the overall candidate experience.
The interview process often included multiple technical assessment rounds, with a focus on core engineering concepts, debugging tasks, and practical problem-solving, which candidates found to be challenging and relevant.
Many candidates experienced behavioral interviews that emphasized fit and motivation, with questions aimed at understanding their problem-solving approach and alignment with ASML's values.
Several candidates went through a HireVue video assessment as an initial step, which focused on behavioral questions and allowed for flexible preparation time, but sometimes felt impersonal and less technical.
Candidates noted varying levels of organization in the interview process, with some experiencing disorganized scheduling and unclear communication, which affected their overall impression of the company.
Feedback on outcomes varied, with many candidates not receiving offers, often citing the need for better alignment of their skills with the role expectations and the importance of clear communication throughout the process.