Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at ASM, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I had a pretty clean two-round experience that went smoothly from start to finish. The interviews were one virtual and one in person, and both felt professional and low-stress. For me, the technical part was surprisingly not hard—I remember the interviewers being chill and treating the discussion like an engineering conversation rather than an interrogation.
After a recruiter reached out, I went through a short early conversation that mostly felt like light discussion about my background and what I could bring to the department. The questions stayed fairly typical—work scenarios, my job function, and why I was interested in the company—without anything very technical that day.
The interview process typically involves multiple rounds, starting with an HR screening followed by technical interviews with engineers and managers, often extending over several weeks or even months. Candidates reported a lack of clarity and organization in scheduling, leading to frustration.
Candidates can expect a mix of coding challenges and technical questions focusing on both front-end and back-end skills, often requiring problem-solving and system design discussions. The technical rounds are generally straightforward but can include tricky questions that test depth of knowledge.
Behavioral questions are a significant part of the interview process, with interviewers looking to understand candidates' motivations, teamwork, and past experiences. The tone of these discussions can vary widely, with some candidates feeling rushed or disrespected during their interactions.
Several candidates reported technical difficulties during virtual interviews, such as poor audio quality and camera issues, which hindered effective communication and created a negative experience. This aspect can significantly impact the overall impression of the interview.
Candidates often expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of timely feedback and communication after interviews, with some experiencing long waits for updates or feeling ghosted. This lack of transparency can leave candidates feeling uncertain about their performance and the outcome.
The overall candidate experience varies, with some reporting friendly and supportive interviewers while others faced unwelcoming environments and chaotic scheduling. Candidates emphasized the importance of a respectful and organized process for a positive impression.