Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Anduril, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
I interviewed for a Software Engineer role and got cut after the first medium technical round, with a quick timeline.
I went through a classic multi-round Anduril loop—recruiter screen into several technical interviews plus behavioral/system-design elements—with a moderate-to-average difficulty feel.
The initial recruiter screen typically involves a casual conversation about your background, motivation, and fit for the role, often with a focus on behavioral questions. This step is generally friendly and serves as a basic qualification before deeper technical discussions.
Candidates can expect one or more coding rounds, often featuring LeetCode-style problems that range from easy to medium difficulty. These rounds serve as a primary filter for technical skills and may include follow-up questions based on the candidate's approach.
The interview process often includes a panel of engineers conducting multiple back-to-back interviews that cover coding, behavioral, and sometimes system design questions. This format can be intense and may vary in difficulty based on the specific team or role.
For some candidates, there is a dedicated system design round that focuses on architectural trade-offs and problem-solving relevant to the company's projects. This round can be challenging and requires a solid understanding of design principles.
Candidates frequently report issues with communication throughout the interview process, including delays in scheduling, unclear next steps, and lack of feedback after interviews. This can lead to frustration and uncertainty about the overall process.
The overall difficulty of the interview process varies, with some candidates finding it to be highly competitive and intense, while others describe it as more relaxed. Success often hinges on both technical performance and fit with the company's culture.