Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Software Engineer at Anduril, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
A recruiter reached out to me with a message that looked AI-generated. I tried to move things forward by asking to speak directly with a real person, and I kept running into the same issue—every reply somehow looped back to the automated tone. Eventually she provided me with a “role” that also felt automated, tailored from my resume and describing a city office that I knew didn’t actually exist for Anduril.
I started with a recruiter call, then about a week later I had a hiring-manager technical interview over Zoom. The timing felt a bit stretched—after that, a final round got scheduled for roughly two weeks later, and it was described as typically on-site.
Initial recruiter calls vary in tone from automated to friendly, with some candidates experiencing a disconnect between the recruiting pitch and actual role expectations. The recruiter interactions often focus on fit and logistics rather than deep technical discussions.
Candidates typically face a technical coding screen that includes LeetCode-style problems, with some variations such as simulation exercises or debugging tasks. The difficulty level is generally moderate, focusing on fundamental coding skills and problem-solving abilities.
The on-site interview consists of multiple components, including technical coding rounds, system design challenges, and behavioral interviews. Candidates report a mix of straightforward and challenging questions, with an emphasis on both technical skills and cultural fit.
The overall atmosphere during interviews can vary, with some candidates noting a chaotic environment and interviewer fatigue, while others describe a more relaxed and organized experience. This can impact candidates' perceptions of the company's internal dynamics.
Candidates often express frustration with the lack of closure after interviews, with some experiencing ghosting after initial positive interactions. Clear communication and timely feedback are noted as areas for improvement in the recruiting process.
Candidates report that interviews often require them to demonstrate their problem-solving abilities in practical scenarios, rather than just theoretical knowledge. This includes discussions around project presentations and real-world applications of their skills.