Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Financial Analyst at AIG Claims, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After a recruiter call, I ended up with two interview rounds that mixed technical and behavioral questions. The overall process felt fairly standard for an analyst role, but what caught me off guard was the level of the technical content—there were maths, programming, and actuary-adjacent questions that felt more like what you’d see at a higher level rather than something expected from a graduate.
This interview experience felt genuinely chaotic from the start. I got a phone interview invitation very early on a Saturday morning, which was already unusual. I replied quickly and confirmed availability for the following Thursday, but I didn’t get any real follow-up until I proactively reached out again on Tuesday to confirm the details.
The interview process typically starts with a recruiter call, followed by multiple rounds that may include HR and team members, often culminating in a superday format with several back-to-back interviews. Candidates noted varying timelines, with some experiencing delays and a lack of communication throughout the process.
Candidates reported a significant emphasis on technical and quantitative questions, often involving math and finance fundamentals, which felt more advanced than expected for the role. This focus on quantitative depth was a common theme that raised the difficulty level of the interviews.
Behavioral questions were a central component of the interviews, with many candidates describing a friendly and low-stress atmosphere where interviewers sought to understand their experiences and fit within the team. The questions often revolved around past experiences and situational responses.
Candidates expressed mixed feelings about the professionalism of the interview process, with some reporting chaotic experiences, lack of follow-up, and unclear communication, which negatively impacted their overall impression of the company. Others noted a more organized and respectful experience.
Candidates felt that preparation for the interviews should include both technical knowledge and behavioral storytelling, as the interviews often required a balance of both. Some wished they had prepared more for the technical aspects, while others felt the behavioral side was more critical.
Many candidates reported not receiving offers and expressed disappointment over the lack of feedback and closure at the end of the process, which left them feeling uncertain about their performance and the reasons for their rejection.