Real, anonymous reports from people who interviewed for Business Analyst at AIG Claims, newest first and distilled into what to expect across the loop.
After I got past the initial resume screen, the process moved quickly. I had a HireVue-style interview next, and then I went through three more interviews. The technical part didn’t feel especially hard, but the overall flow leaned heavily on behavioral questions, and that ended up taking more energy than I expected.
My process started with a phone call that invited me to an onsite interview. Before the interviews even began, I was given an assessment, and then I had a roughly 30-minute conversation with two team members.
The interview process typically consists of a phone screen followed by multiple onsite interviews, often involving direct managers and team members, with a focus on both technical and behavioral questions. Candidates reported a generally structured and organized flow, with a mix of formats including in-person and phone interviews.
Candidates can expect a heavy emphasis on behavioral and situational questions, often framed around real work scenarios, requiring specific examples from past experiences. The STAR method is frequently used to assess how candidates handle various workplace situations.
While the technical component is not overly challenging, candidates should prepare for discussions around business analysis skills, including SQL queries and data interpretation, as well as how to document and communicate findings effectively. The focus is on practical application rather than theoretical knowledge.
Candidates have noted that communication during the process can be inconsistent, particularly regarding follow-up after interviews, which may lead to feelings of uncertainty. It's advisable to follow up with thank-you notes and reiterate interest in the role to maintain engagement.
Interviews often include a focus on cultural fit, with questions aimed at understanding how candidates would integrate into the team and company culture. This aspect becomes more pronounced in later rounds, where personality and team dynamics are evaluated.
Candidates have experienced varying timelines, with some reporting quick follow-ups and others facing delays. Generally, the process is described as efficient, with clear communication about next steps, but candidates should be prepared for potential scheduling issues.