BairesDev's internal engineering platform team supports the BairesDev Talent Platform and several client-facing delivery tools. Over the last 2 quarters, leadership sees high activity but is unsure whether output is translating into meaningful business impact.
In Q1, the team of 24 engineers completed 312 story points, merged 428 pull requests, and attended 61 hours/week of recurring meetings. In Q2, activity increased to 356 story points (+14%), 497 pull requests (+16%), and 68 meeting hours/week (+11%). However, product outcomes moved in mixed directions: deployment frequency improved from 18 to 24 releases/month, but change failure rate rose from 6% to 11%, mean time to recovery increased from 2.1 to 4.8 hours, and the percentage of roadmap items delivering expected business impact within 30 days fell from 72% to 54%. On the product side, recruiter task completion in the BairesDev Talent Platform improved only from 81% to 82%, while candidate profile submission conversion declined from 14.2% to 13.1%.
The VP of Engineering asks you to define a KPI framework that distinguishes being busy from being effective, identify the most important leading and lagging indicators, and explain what likely drove the Q2 gap between engineering activity and business results.
jira_issues: issue_id, team_id, story_points, issue_type, created_at, completed_at, roadmap_epic_idgithub_prs: pr_id, repo, engineer_id, opened_at, merged_at, lines_changed, review_cyclesdeployments_incidents: deployment_id, service, deployed_at, incident_flag, recovery_time_hoursfeature_adoption_events: feature_id, account_id, event_name, event_timeproduct_funnel_metrics: date, recruiter_task_completion_rate, candidate_submission_conversion, active_accounts