Airwallex Pty is a global payments and financial platform serving SMBs and mid-market businesses across APAC, Europe, and North America. Its core products include Global Accounts, Transfers, Cards, and Spend. Airwallex is planning to expand onboarding and transaction coverage into 8 additional markets over the next 12 months, but its current sanctions and politically exposed persons (PEP) screening stack is becoming a bottleneck for both product velocity and compliance operations.
You are the Engineering Manager responsible for a platform decision: should Airwallex build a sanctions/PEP screening capability in-house as part of its risk and compliance infrastructure, or integrate a third-party vendor and focus internal engineering effort elsewhere? The decision matters now because onboarding volume is rising, regulators are increasing expectations for explainability and auditability, and commercial teams want faster market launches. The choice will affect cost, launch speed, control over roadmap, and long-term defensibility.
| Metric | Current / Assumption |
|---|---|
| Annual new business onboarding reviews | 420,000 |
| Annual transaction screening events | 180 million |
| Current false-positive rate on manual review queue | 2.8% of onboarding checks; 0.06% of transaction events |
| Compliance operations cost per manual case | A$7.50 onboarding; A$1.20 transaction alert |
| Estimated in-house build cost | A$3.8M first year, A$1.4M annual run-rate thereafter |
| Vendor option | A$1.1M implementation + A$0.018 per onboarding check + A$0.0018 per transaction event |
| Time to first usable version | 9 months in-house vs 3 months vendor-led integration |
| Target launch window for 8 new markets | Within 6 months |
Additional context: